The Rolex Oyster Perpetual and the Omega Aqua Terra stand out as premier choices for those seeking versatility and style. Both watches offer a range of colors and sizes, making them natural competitors deserving of a closer look. Recently, we explored the new Omega Aqua Terra Shades collection. In this comparison, we'll pit this vibrant selection against the 36mm Rolex Oyster Perpetual. While they share similarities as top-tier watches, each watch also presents unique characteristics that cater to different preferences. The Rolex Explorer II, specifically the ref. 226570, represents a classic GMT option, while the Grand Seiko Evolution 9 GMT offers a modern twist. Surprisingly, the Grand Seiko garnered more votes thanks to its precision and bold design. On a personal note, I own a clone Rolex Oyster Perpetual - specifically, the Explorer ref. 114270. Apart from the numerals at 3, 6, and 9 o'clock, it closely resembles the Oyster Perpetual. For me, the Oyster Perpetual reigns supreme. Its timeless design has remained largely unchanged, a testament to its enduring appeal. The slender, curvy Oyster case perfectly balances elegance and sportiness, whether on a strap or a bracelet. Among the configurations Rolex offers, the silver dial with yellow-gold indices captures my attention the most. It showcases the watch's simplicity and perfection. However, I wouldn't hesitate to wear an Oyster Perpetual with a Racing Green dial or any other color. The applied stick hour markers and the Rolex coronet at 6 o'clock maintain an impressive balance in size and proportion. If I could change one thing about the current Oyster Perpetual, it would be the convex bezel. The beveled bezel on my Explorer lends a sportier aesthetic, whereas the domed bezel of the current model appears overly friendly. As for the Aqua Terra, while its quality is commendable, it cannot compete with the replica Rolex Oyster bracelet. The polished center links don't resonate with my preferences. The Aqua Terra's case, characterized by its twisted lugs, is distinctly Omega and fits well in the 38mm size. However, I'm not a fan of its crown design or the high positioning of the date window, which disrupts the dial's harmony. When comparing prices, the Aqua Terra surprises with a list price of €7,300, while the Oyster Perpetual is more accessible at €6,100. Although the Aqua Terra offers a date function for the price difference, many believe it edges too close to luxury without sufficient justification. In contrast, the Oyster Perpetual's availability often proves challenging, as it may not be readily found in stores. The Aqua Terra's aesthetic appeal and performance cannot be overlooked. I believe its contemporary 38mm size offers a more versatile fit, while its refined bracelet enhances comfort. In contrast, the Rolex Oyster bracelet feels somewhat bulky. A key advantage of the Aqua Terra is its Co-Axial caliber 8800, which outshines the basic movement of the Oyster Perpetual. This movement undergoes rigorous METAS certification, ensuring precise timekeeping. Additionally, the Aqua Terra's dial features uniquely designed markers that interact beautifully with light, contrasting with the blocky markers of the Oyster Perpetual. While the Aqua Terra may be slightly more expensive, it delivers greater value with its superior design, accuracy, and a broader selection of appealing colors. Furthermore, it tends to attract less attention, making it a discreet choice for those who prefer subtlety. Ultimately, the availability of the Aqua Terra at authorized dealers contrasts sharply with the long wait often associated with purchasing an Oyster Perpetual. In the luxury watch market, the ability to purchase a coveted watch promptly is a significant advantage. Both watches have their merits, but my preference leans toward the Omega Aqua Terra for its modernity, comfort, and overall design. May the best watch win!